Complications Following Tissue Expander-Based Reconstruction in Pediatric Burn Injuries: A Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Tissue expansion has been widely used to reconstruct soft tissue defects following burn injuries in pediatric patients, allowing for satisfactory cosmetic and functional outcomes. Factors impacting the success of tissue expander (TE)-based reconstruction in these patients are poorly understood. Herein, we aim to determine the risk factors for postoperative complications following TE-based reconstruction in pediatric burn patients. METHODS: A retrospective review of pediatric patients who underwent TE placement for burn reconstruction from 2006 to 2019 was performed. Primary outcomes were major complications (TE explantation, extrusion, replacement, flap necrosis, unplanned reoperation, readmission) and wound complications (surgical site infection and wound dehiscence). Descriptive statistics were calculated. The association between primary outcomes, patient demographics, burn characteristics, and TE characteristics was assessed using the chi-squared, Fisher's exact, and Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: Of 28 patients included in the study, the median [interquartile range (IQR)] age was 6.5 (3.3-11.8) years, with a follow-up of 12 (7-32) months. The majority were males [n = 20 (71%)], Black patients [n = 11 (39%)], and experienced burns due to flames [n = 78 (29%)]. Eleven (39%) patients experienced major complications, most commonly TE premature explantation [n = 6 (21%)]. Patients who experienced major complications, compared to those who did not, had a significantly greater median (IQR) % total body surface area (TBSA) [38 (27-52), 10 (5-19), P = 0.002] and number of TEs inserted [2 (2-3), 1 (1-2), P = 0.01]. Ten (36%) patients experienced wound complications, most commonly surgical site infection following TE placement [n = 6 (21%)]. Patients who experienced wound complications, compared to those who did not, had a significantly greater median (IQR) %TBSA [35 (18-45), 19 (13-24), P = 0.02]. CONCLUSION: Pediatric burn injuries involving greater than 30% TBSA and necessitating an increasing number of TEs were associated with worse postoperative complications following TE-based reconstruction.

Triplane technique for breast reconstruction after breast cancer surgery: A case series report.

RATIONALE: Implant-based breast reconstruction is an important method for post-mastectomy breast reconstruction. Currently, the most commonly used technique is the biplane technique. However, the high rate of postoperative complications, the inability of pockets to accommodate larger implants, and the expensive costs of biological mesh make the development of new surgical methods urgent. The triplane technique for breast reconstruction is an ideal candidate method. PATIENT CONCERNS: The main local symptoms were breast lump, abnormal breast skin, nipple discharge, and abnormal nipple or areola in 24 patients. DIAGNOSES: The study included 24 female patients who underwent breast reconstruction using the triplane technique after radical breast cancer surgery. INTERVENTIONS: The surgical procedure involved measuring the dimensions of the breast, designing the incision, and creating a pocket for the implant using the triplane technique, which includes the pectoralis major muscle, the pectoralis major fascia continuing to the rectus abdominis fascia, and the latissimus dorsa muscle fascia continuing to the rectus abdominis fascia. Postoperative follow-up included regular assessments of pain and evaluation of breast appearance. OUTCOMES: No cases of postoperative infection were observed in all patients. During the 1-year follow-up period after surgery, 5 patients (20.8%) who needed radiotherapy after mastectomy for cancer showed slight darkening of skin flap pigment after using the triplane technique implant. No cases of exposure or infection of the expanders were reported, and 1 patient underwent expander replacement with a permanent prosthesis. All patients expressed satisfaction with the reconstructed breast shape. The 10 patients (41.7%) experiencing postoperative swelling and pain. However, the pain gradually subsided during the postoperative recovery period. No cases of local recurrence or distant metastasis of breast cancer were observed during the 1-year-follow-up period. LESSONS: The triplane technique for breast reconstruction after breast cancer surgery provides good implant coverage, reduces the risk of complications, and is cost-effective.

Prediction model for haematoma after tissue expander placement: A retrospective cohort study of 7080 cases over 20 years.

Haematoma is an early complication of tissue expander placement and can lead to infection, capsule contracture and various complications, hindering successful reconstruction. However, no scientific models can accurately predict the risk of haematoma following tissue expansion. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and validate a prediction model for haematoma following tissue expander placement. The medical records of patients who underwent expander placement between 2001 and 2021 were obtained from the clinical database of the Department of Plastic Surgery at the Xijing Hospital. A total of 4579 consecutive patients with 7080 expanders and 179 expanded pocket haematomas were analysed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified adult age (P = 0.006), male sex (P < 0.001), scar reconstruction (P = 0.019), perioperative hypertension (P < 0.001), face and neck location (P = 0.002) and activated partial thromboplastin time above the normal range (P < 0.001) as risk factors for haematoma. Therefore, these were included in the prediction model, and a nomogram was constructed. The discrimination of the nomogram was robust (area under the curve: 0.78; 95% confidence interval: 0.72-0.83). Further, the prediction model had a strong fit (Hosmer-Lemeshow test, P = 0.066) and maintained similar discrimination after considering performance optimism (bootstrapped area under the curve: 0.79; 95% confidence interval: 0.73-0.84). This clinical prediction model was created using a generalisable dataset and can be utilised to obtain valid haematoma predictions after expander placement, assisting surgeons in implementing preventive measures or interventions to reduce the occurrence of haematoma.

Stepwise self-inflating hydrogel expansion for congenital anophthalmia and blind microphthalmia: Over 15 years' experience in China.

BACKGROUND: Self-inflating hydrogel expanders have been used to treat anophthalmia and blind microphthalmia. This study aimed to investigate the long-term outcomes of treatment with self-inflating hydrogel expanders for congenital anophthalmia and blind microphthalmia. METHODS: In this retrospective study, the medical records of 161 patients with anophthalmia and blind microphthalmia who underwent hydrogel expansion were reviewed. We measured the palpebral fissure height (PFH), palpebral fissure length (PFL), and distance between the inner canthal and mid-nasal line (ICMN) before and after surgery. Cox regression analysis was conducted to determine which variables were related to the implantation of spherical expanders following hemispherical expander implantation. RESULTS: After treatment, the PFH and PFL increased significantly (p < 0.001). Complications including expander migration and extrusion occurred in 15 cases. Five patients needed enucleation or further dermis fat graft implantation because of insufficient expansion. The necessity for further spherical expansion was substantially related to a relative axial length (rAL) <0.5 (p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: Self-inflating hydrogel expansion can significantly increase the lid fissure. The occurrence of complications is rare, and surgical intervention can effectively address them. Abnormal eyes with a rAL of less than 0.5 demonstrate a higher possibility of needing additional orbital expansion.

Machine learning analysis of online patient questions regarding breast reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Social media has become a dominant educational resource for breast reconstruction patients. Rather than passively consuming information, patients interact directly with other users and healthcare professionals. While online information for breast reconstruction has been analyzed previously, a robust analysis of patient questions on online forums has not been conducted. In this study, the authors used a machine learning approach to analyze and categorize online patient questions regarding breast reconstruction. METHODS: Realself.com was accessed and questions pertaining to breast reconstruction were extracted. Data collected included the date of question, poster's location, question header, question text, and available tags. Questions were analyzed and categorized by two independent reviewers. RESULTS: 522 preoperative questions were analyzed. Geographic analysis is displayed in Figure 1. Questions were often asked in the pre-mastectomy period (38.3%); however, patients with tissue expanders currently in place made up 28.5%. Questions were often related to reconstructive methods (23.2%), implant selection (19.5%), and tissue expander concerns (16.7%). Questions asked in the post-lumpectomy period were significantly more likely to be related to insurance/cost and reconstructive candidacy (p < 0.01). The "Top 6″ patient questions were determined by machine learning analysis, and the most common of which was "Can I get good results going direct to implant after mastectomy?" CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of online questions provides valuable insights and may help inform our educational approach toward our breast reconstruction patients. Our findings suggest that questions are common throughout the reconstructive process and do not end after the initial consultation. Patients most often want more information on the reconstructive options, implant selection, and the tissue expansion process.

Early Complications in Prepectoral Tissue Expander-Based Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Prepectoral implant placement for postmastectomy breast reconstruction has increased in recent years. Benefits of prepectoral reconstruction may include lack of animation deformities and reduced postoperative pain, but its complication profile is currently unclear. This study aimed to examine the complication profile of prepectoral tissue expanders (TEs) to determine factors associated with TE loss. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed to identify all patients who underwent immediate prepectoral TE reconstruction from January 2018 to June 2021. The decision to use the prepectoral technique was based on mastectomy skin quality and patient comorbidities. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and operative details were evaluated. Outcomes of interest included TE loss, seroma, hematoma, infection/cellulitis, mastectomy skin flap necrosis requiring revision, and TE exposure. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with TE loss. RESULTS: The study identified 1225 TEs. The most frequent complications were seroma (8.7%, n = 106), infection/cellulitis (8.2%, n = 101), and TE loss (4.2%, n = 51). Factors associated with TE loss in the univariate analysis included ethnicity, history of smoking, body mass index, mastectomy weight, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In the multivariate regression analysis, only mastectomy weight had a positive association with TE loss (odds ratio, 1.001; p = 0.016). CONCLUSION: Prepectoral two-stage breast reconstruction can be performed safely with an acceptable early complication profile. The study data suggest that increasing mastectomy weight is the most significant factor associated with TE loss. Further research examining the quality of the soft tissue envelope and assessing patient-reported outcomes would prove beneficial.

The Dynamic Changes in Skin Thickness of Forehead during Tissue Expansion.

In addition to providing extra flap size, the tissue expansion process also brings changes in flap thickness. This study aims to identify the changes in the forehead flap thickness during the tissue expansion period. Patients undergoing forehead expander embedment from September 2021 to September 2022 were included. The thickness of the forehead skin and subcutaneous tissue were measured with ultrasound before and 1, 2, 3, and 4 months after expansion. Twelve patients were included. The average expansion period was 4.6 months, and the mean expansion volume was 657.1 mL. The thickness of skin and subcutaneous tissue in the central forehead changed from 1.09 ± 0.06 to 0.63 ± 0.05 mm and from 2.53 ± 0.25 to 0.71 ± 0.09 mm, respectively. In the left frontotemporal region, skin and subcutaneous tissue thickness changed from 1.03 ± 0.05 to 0.52 ± 0.05 mm and 2.02 ± 0.21 to 0.62 ± 0.08 mm. On the right side, skin and subcutaneous tissue thickness changed from 1.01 ± 0.05 to 0.50 ± 0.04 mm and 2.06 ± 0.21 to 0.50 ± 0.05 mm. This study measured the dynamic changes in the thickness of the forehead flap during expansion. The thickness of the forehead flap decreased the fastest in the first 2 months of expansion, and the changes in skin and subcutaneous thickness slowed down in the third and fourth months and tended to a minimum value. Additionally, the thickness of subcutaneous tissue decreased greater in magnitude than the dermal tissue.

Textured versus Smooth Tissue Expanders: A Comparison of Complications in 3526 Breast Reconstructions.

BACKGROUND: Increased understanding of breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma has led to a shift away from textured breast devices. A few small studies have compared the complication rates of textured and smooth tissue expanders (TEs). The aim of this study was to compare complication profiles in patients undergoing two-stage postmastectomy breast reconstruction with either textured or smooth TEs. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective review of female patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction with textured or smooth TEs from 2018 to 2020 at their institution. Rates of seroma, infection/cellulitis, malposition/rotation, exposure, and TE loss were analyzed in the overall cohort and subgroups undergoing prepectoral and subpectoral TE placement. A propensity score-matched analysis was used to decrease the effects of confounders comparing textured and smooth TEs. RESULTS: The authors analyzed 3526 TEs (1456 textured and 2070 smooth). More frequent use of acellular dermal matrix, SPY angiography, and prepectoral TE placement was noted in the smooth TE cohort ( P < 0.001). Univariate analysis suggested higher rates of infection/cellulitis, malposition/rotation, and exposure in smooth TEs (all P < 0.01). Rates of TE loss did not differ. After propensity matching, no differences were noted in infection or TE loss. Prepectoral smooth expanders had increased rates of malposition/rotation. CONCLUSIONS: TE surface type did not affect rates of TE loss, although increased rates of expander malposition were noted in the smooth prepectoral cohort. Further research is needed to examine breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma risk with temporary textured TE exposure to improve decision-making. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCW: Therapeutic, III.

Efficacy of Prophylactic Postoperative Antibiotics in Tissue Expander-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Conflicting evidence exists regarding the utility of prophylactic postoperative antibiotics in tissue expander (TE)-based breast reconstruction. This study evaluated the risk of surgical-site infection between patients receiving 24 hours of perioperative antibiotics alone versus prolonged postoperative antibiotics within a propensity score-matched cohort. METHODS: Patients undergoing TE-based breast reconstruction receiving 24 hours of perioperative antibiotics alone were propensity score-matched 1:3 to patients receiving postoperative antibiotics based on demographics, comorbidities, and treatment factors. Incidence of surgical-site infection was compared based on duration of antibiotic prophylaxis. RESULTS: Of a total of 431 patients undergoing TE-based breast reconstruction, postoperative antibiotics were prescribed in 77.2%. Within this cohort, 348 were included for propensity matching (no antibiotics, 87 patients; antibiotics, 261 patients). After propensity score matching, there was no significant difference in incidence of infection requiring intravenous (no antibiotics, 6.9%; antibiotics, 4.6%; P = 0.35) or oral antibiotics (no antibiotics, 11.5%; antibiotics, 16.1%; P = 0.16). In addition, rates of unplanned reoperation ( P = 0.88) and 30-day readmission ( P = 0.19) were similar. After multivariate adjustment, prescription of postoperative antibiotics was not associated with a reduction in surgical-site infection (OR, 0.5; 95% CI, -0.3 to 1.3; P = 0.23). CONCLUSIONS: Within a propensity score-matched cohort accounting for patient comorbidities and receipt of adjuvant therapies, prescription of postoperative antibiotics after TE-based breast reconstruction conferred no improvement in rates of TE infection, reoperation, or unplanned health care use. These data underscore the need for multicenter randomized trials on the utility of antibiotic prophylaxis in TE-based breast reconstruction. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Safety and factors affecting same-day discharge following mastectomy and immediate alloplastic reconstruction.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Patients undergoing breast reconstruction following mastectomy are often admitted overnight. In 2020, our institution implemented a protocol change to discharge clinically stable patients immediately. In this study, we examine the safety of same-day discharge following mastectomy and reconstruction. METHODS: Our retrospective study included female adults undergoing mastectomy and immediate alloplastic reconstruction from August 2019 to January 2020, before implementation of the same-day discharge protocol, and from March 2020 to September 2021, after the protocol implementation. Independent t-test and chi-square analysis was conducted to examine statistical differences. RESULTS: Two hundred and eighty-five patients were included. Forty-two patients underwent reconstruction before the protocol change (Group 1) and 243 patients underwent reconstruction after the protocol change (Group 2). Group 2 had a greater percentage of prepectoral implant placement. There was no difference in demographics, complications, readmission, or reoperation. Within Group 2, 157 patients were discharged the same day (Group 2a) and 88 patients required overnight admission (Group 2b). Group 2b had higher body mass index, higher percentage of bilateral mastectomy, and larger mastectomy weights. Despite no differences in complications, Group 2b exhibited higher rates of requiring intravenous antibiotics and reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: Patients may be safely discharged the same day following mastectomy and alloplastic reconstruction without an increase in complications.

The current use of tissue expanders in breast reconstruction: device design, features, and technical considerations.

INTRODUCTION: The use of tissue expanders (TE) in post-mastectomy breast reconstruction is a widely accepted practice, especially in patients desiring implant-based breast reconstruction. It has become the standard of care to perform a two-staged breast reconstruction using tissue expanders for the past 50 years due to its reliability, safety, cost-effectiveness, and versatility. Due to its popularity, there are numerous types and features of breast tissue expanders and various surgical approaches available for plastic surgeons. AREAS COVERED: In this article, we will review the role of tissue expanders in breast reconstruction, the types and features of breast tissue expanders, and technical considerations. EXPERT OPINION: The use of tissue expanders in breast reconstruction offers significant advantages of preserving the breast skin envelope and reestablishing the breast mound. With evolving approaches to breast reconstruction, tissue expander design, and application underwent several refinements and modifications. Due to these advances, studies on its long-term efficacy and safety profile typically fall behind and more studies with higher levels of evidence are needed to better evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of tissue expanders. With increased understanding, reconstructive surgeons can minimize complications and maximize reconstructive, aesthetic outcomes with high patient satisfaction.

Lower Extremity Pediatric Tissue Expansion: A Single Surgeon's 16-Year Experience.

BACKGROUND: Tissue expansion is a well-established approach to soft tissue reconstruction in the pediatric population for lower extremity pathologies. Unfortunately, complication rates range from 19% to 40% in literature, including infection and implant extrusion, leading to delays in reconstruction. These challenges have prompted investigation toward categorizing risk factors for lower extremity tissue expander placement. METHODS: A retrospective study of pediatric patients who underwent lower extremity tissue expander placement by the senior author (R.J.R.) was performed over a 16-year period. Patient charts were reviewed to categorize baseline and operative characteristics. Primary outcome variables were surgical-site infection, expander extrusion, and expander deflation. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed ( α < 0.05). RESULTS: There were 59 tissue expanders in our cohort. The overall complication rate was 27.1% with a 77.2% successful reconstruction rate. Greater number of expanders placed during 1 operation is associated with 2.5 increased odds of having any complication and is associated with 0.4 decreased odds of having a successful reconstruction. Incisions made in scar tissue for expander placement appear to be associated with a greater than 7 times increased odds of readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Reconstruction of soft tissue pathologies using lower extremity tissue expanders in the pediatric population is an effective yet challenging technique. This study identified that the number of expanders inserted during 1 operation, incisions made over scar tissue, and expanders placed in the anterior thigh were correlated with having a negative impact on reconstructive outcomes. Extra care should be taken with patients who require multiple expanders during 1 operation and with choosing the location and incision of expander placement.

Smooth vs Textured Expanders: Patient Factors and Anatomic Plane Are Greater Factors in Determining First-Stage Breast Reconstruction Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Textured implants and expanders are associated with an increased risk of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL). As a result, plastic surgeons are utilizing smooth expanders, but many perceive these produce undesirable outcomes including infection, seroma, and lateral displacement. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of smooth and textured expanders. METHODS: Breast reconstruction patients from January 2018 to May 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Included patients underwent placement of tissue expanders at the time of mastectomy. Primary outcomes included postoperative seroma, infection, malposition, days to final reconstruction, explantation, and the need for capsulorrhaphy. RESULTS: In total, 233 patients were reviewed, of whom 167 met both inclusion and exclusion criteria. There was no statistically significant difference in poor outcomes comparing smooth and textured expanders. Days to final reconstruction was lower with smooth expanders per breast (P = .0424). The subpectoral group was associated with an increased likelihood of undergoing capsulorrhaphy (P = .004). Prepectoral placement was associated with more seromas (P = .0176) and infections (P = .0245). Demographic factors included older age as a protective factor for undergoing capsulorrhaphy (odds ratio [OR] = 0.962, P = .038), obesity increased the risk of infection (OR = 5.683, P = .0279) and malposition (OR = 6.208, P = .0222), and radiation was associated with malposition (OR = 3.408, P = .0246). CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in poor outcomes between smooth and textured expanders. Patient demographics and anatomical plane placement had greater effects on infection, seroma, and the need for capsulorrhaphy compared with tissue expander texturing.

Impact of Initial Filling Medium on Outcomes of Subpectoral, Two-Stage, Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Air versus Saline.

BACKGROUND: In two-stage expander-based breast reconstruction, the use of air as the initial filling medium has been suggested to confer clinical advantages over conventional saline, but this has not been demonstrated in a large series. This study aimed to evaluate the association between material type (air versus saline) for initial expander filling and postoperative outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who underwent immediate, subpectoral, tissue expander-based breast reconstruction between January of 2018 and March of 2021. The participants were categorized into two groups according to the material used for initial filling: saline-inflated expanders, which were used during the first 22 months consecutively, and air-inflated expanders, which were used during the latter 17 months consecutively. Complications including mastectomy flap necrosis and postoperative expansion profiles were compared. Multivariable analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of postoperative complications. RESULTS: A total of 443 breasts (400 patients), including 161 air-filled and 282 saline-filled breasts, were analyzed. The two groups had similar baseline characteristics. The air-filled group showed a significantly lower rate of mastectomy flap necrosis; this difference remained significant after adjustment for other variables in the multivariable analysis. The rates of other complications did not differ between the two groups. The air-filled group had fewer office visits and a shorter period to complete expansion. CONCLUSIONS: The use of air for initial expander filling could provide safe and reliable outcomes with reduced patient discomfort during postoperative expansion; thus, air-filled expanders might be an effective alternative to saline-filled expanders. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Outcomes after tissue expander exchange to implant in two-stage prepectoral breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix: A retrospective cohort study.

As prepectoral implant placement becomes widely adopted, recent studies investigating the use of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) during tissue expander placement have demonstrated no major benefit with regard to postoperative outcomes. We sought to evaluate second-stage outcomes 1 year after tissue expander exchange to implant with and without ADM. Consecutive patients who underwent prepectoral tissue expander-based breast reconstruction with and without ADM were identified. Patients were followed up for 1 year after tissue expander exchange to implant. Second-stage outcomes of interest including implant rippling, capsular contracture, implant explantation, additional revision surgeries, and patient-reported outcomes were collected and compared. Sixty-eight breasts in the ADM cohort and sixty-one breasts in the no ADM cohort underwent tissue expander exchange to implant. Second-stage outcomes of interest were similar between the ADM and no ADM cohorts with no statistically significant differences identified regarding incidences of implant rippling (24.6% vs. 12.1%, p = 0.08), capsular contracture (4.5% vs. 3.3%, p = 1.00), and explantation (6.6% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.67) between the two cohorts. BREAST-Q scores were similar between the two cohorts with the exception of physical wellbeing and satisfaction in terms of implant rippling, as can be seen, which improved in the no ADM cohort (p = 0.04). Our study reports no major benefit for the inclusion of ADM with respect to implant rippling, capsular contracture, explantation, need for additional revision surgeries, and patient-reported satisfaction in prepectoral second-stage implant-based breast reconstruction.

A Simple Technique Using Peri-Prosthetic Irrigation Improves Implant Salvage Rates in Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.

Background and objectives: Implant-related complications leading to implant loss contribute to major morbidity in immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). Various techniques have been advocated to improve rates of reconstruction salvage. The objective of our study was to assess if a peri-prosthetic irrigation system was an effective adjunct to the conventional wash-out technique in improving reconstruction salvage rates. Methods: The study included patients who had immediate implant-based breast reconstruction from January 2015 to November 2020. The conventional technique of reconstruction salvage, using debridement, wash-out, and implant/expander exchange with systemic use of antibiotics, was performed for patients undergoing exploration for infection until May 2019. A simple technique using a continuous peri-prosthetic irrigation system with vancomycin (1 g/L normal saline over 24 h) for 2 days was added as an adjunct to the conventional technique. Treatment details and clinical outcomes were compared between the groups. The study was approved by the Clinical Governance department. Results: During the study period, 335 patients underwent IBR. A total of 65 patients (19.4%) returned to the theatre due to post-operative complications, of which 45 (13.4%) were due to infection. A conventional technique was used in 38 (84.4%) patients, and peri-prosthetic irrigation was used as an adjunct in 7 patients (15.6%). A total of 16 (42.1%) in the conventional group and all 7 (100%) in the irrigation group had successful reconstruction salvage. No patients had complications due to antibiotic irrigation. Conclusions: The peri-prosthetic irrigation system is a simple, safe, and effective adjunct to conventional techniques in improving reconstruction salvage in IBR.

Missing Data in Patient-Reported Outcomes Research: Utilizing Multiple Imputation to Address an Unavoidable Problem.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have become a focus in postoperative surgical care. Unfortunately, studies using PROs can be subject to missing data, which may lead to biases or inaccurate conclusions. Multiple imputation (MI) is a statistical method for addressing missing data in clinical research. The aim of this study was to explore MI as a way to address missing data in PRO research. METHODS: A working example of MI using real-world data was performed using the BREAST-Q PRO measure in postmastectomy reconstruction. A retrospective review of immediate tissue expander breast reconstruction patients in 2019 was conducted to compare BREAST-Q physical well-being of the chest scores between prepectoral and subpectoral cohorts at 2 weeks postoperatively. The observed dataset and three hypothetical missingness situations were created to assess how increasing missingness affects MI results. RESULTS: Overall, 916 patients were included in the analysis. When excluding patients with missing information and solely performing analysis on the completed cases, prepectoral patients had significantly higher physical well-being of the chest scores at 2 weeks postoperatively; however, this trend was reversed with increasing missingness scenarios, where subpectoral patients had higher scores. In comparison, all MI results showed that prepectoral patients had higher scores on average compared with subpectoral patients regardless of missingness scenario. CONCLUSIONS: MI demonstrated consistent results with increasing missingness scenarios, whereas performing analysis in higher missingness scenarios without MI led to varying results. This working example emphasizes the need for missing data methodology to be considered in PRO research.

Customization of Soft Tissue Expanders: Improving Safety, Accuracy, and Efficiency for Treatment of Large and Complicated Skin Lesions.

BACKGROUND: Soft tissue expansion is a common technique for restoring large skin defects. Fixed-type expanders may be inappropriate for the following reasons: (1) the shapes and sizes of the defects vary in different patients; and (2) the bulged base of the fixed-type expander does not fit the curve of the human body, which may induce complications such as concave deformities or nerve palsy from continuous mechanical compression. The customized expander adjusts better to the shape and the topography of the expansion site compared with the fixed-type expander. It improves expansion efficiency and reduces complications caused by compression. METHODS: Between 2016 and 2022, customized soft tissue expansion was performed in 38 patients with skin lesions, including giant congenital melanocytic nevi and postburn scars. This series of patients included patients with a specific donor site shape that is unsuitable for fixed-type expanders. An expander was customized according to the shape of the donor site and then implanted in the subcutaneous pocket. After the expander reached a sufficient volume, the expander was removed, and the extra expanded skin flap was transferred to resurface the skin lesion. In the follow-up, the outcome and the complications were recorded. RESULTS: All the customized expanders fit not only the dimension but also the topography of the donor site. During expansion, 2 patients experienced leakage of the expander, and 3 patients suffered a skin rupture. In the remaining 33 patients, the expansion was successfully completed, and the expanded flaps restored the skin lesions as designed. The color and texture of the skin flaps remained satisfactory after long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike fixed-type expanders, our customized expanders make it possible for "accurate" expansion, irrespective of the dimension and topography of the donor area. Customization of the expander helps increase efficiency and reduce complications caused by undue compression.